The question I am looking at here is- In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge terms and conventions of real media products?
I did specific research and planning into the basic conventions of posters, magazine covers and teaser trailers.
Alongside analysis of teaser trailers, I looked at a number of posters from different genres and made a list of the design and layout features that were typical of the conventions regardless of genre. For example the posters for "Were The Millers" (Comedy), "One Direction This Is Us" (auto-biography) and "The Family" (gangster). They all included images or backgrounds that reflected that particular genre, production company logos, credits, tag lines, release dates and the title of the film which was always the most dominant and obvious text on the whole poster. I included each of these features in my poster to make it as realistic as possible.I have looked at a range of different posters from different genres to see if the basic conventions between them were similar. The posters I analysed were The Family,One direction This Is Us, Percy Jackson Sea Of Monsters, Were The Millers and Insidious 2.
All the posters I looked at had a dominant central image and were shown in different ways depending on the genre. For example the poster 'The family' portrays the characters in a completely different way to the poster 'Were the Millers'. This is because they are both for completely different genres so although they are both dominant central images the way the poster portrays the image is completely different depending on genre.
Almost all of the posters I analysed had a release date. The releases were often written in different ways . For example the poster 'The Family' release date said this fall. This shows us it is an american born film as the release date makes reference to american language.
Every single poster I looked at had a big bold title on it. All of the posters had the titles in different positions on the poster, different colours or even different fonts and sizes but the title was still the main feature on each poster. The different ways in which the titles were written was definitely because of the different genres in each poster. For example the 'Were the Millers' poster had the title in fun, funky yellow font which showed it was of a comedy genre because the title looked fun and funky whereas the 'Insidious 2' poster had the title in big bold white and red font down the side of the page which showed the audience that the genre was a horror/thriller.
Despite being small, despite being at the bottom and despite not being easy to see, almost every poster has the website stated. This allows audiences to gather even more information about the film, and the website itself usually gives us a better indication of genre.
All posters have have the companies that were involved in the making of the film viable on the poster. This is important as audiences have certain expectations from certain companies as well as this some companies specialise in particular genes.
All of the posters I looked at had many mutual conventions regardless of the genre they were from. This shows us that it doesn't matter about genre because two posters from completely different genres have the same conventions.
This is an example of one of the posters I analysed:
Once I had decided on my genre (Romantic Drama) I looked at posters from the same genre "The Vow" and "The Lucky One"
I then made a note of how genre was represented in these posters, through iconography and props and other design features such as colour scheme, images and font. I found that the posters for the "Romantic Drama" genre always had a image of the two main charterers in love on the on it. I found that they also always had the normal conventions I spoke about earlier. Production company logos, credits, taglines and title of the film but the main difference between the genres was the dominant image.